Palestinian Babies Are Young Snakes. We Kill Them Before Getting Old.

You know most how individuals proceeds control of the power of the State and so abuse that ability like former US President George "Dubya" Bush-league?  "Dubya" started a state of war in Iraq which was highly assisting for some The states businesses.  He achieved this b y claiming Iraq had a nuclear weapons programme which was a serious globe security threat when Republic of iraq did non and when it had already been bombed into oblivion by the war his Dad George Bush-league Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush Great britain The Telegraph By Chrissy Iley 15 Feb 2011.

Think how Bush was supported by Britain Premier Tony Blair who helped past persuading the British Parliament to join the US with faked "intelligence" of Iraq'due south weapons of mass destruction which did not be but which Blair claimed could exist deployed inside 40 minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If you remember that then you lot will know how these kinds of people dispense the media.  Notice how they persuade us we are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they can save the states all if we trust them?

This trickery is not new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this mean solar day.

On CHS we wrote previously about how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated by vaccination when that frankly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the disease came about equally a result of the interaction of three completely unlike factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, especially nutrition and sanitation. The consequence cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – any vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself not to have:

Minor Pox – Large Prevarication – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

At that place was a nasty illness called smallpox and it did kill people long ago.

This was especially the example when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for breeding and spreading affliction: London's first park built after rich feared disease spread from slums Britain The Independent By Andy McSmith Friday 07 Nov 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The middle and upper classes needed to be reassured the State would go on them safety from the threat of disease.  The majority of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could achieve this by ensuring the then truly "cracking unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the affliction controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not work and sometimes killed as many or more the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" still contracted the illness: Smallpox Bloodshed, United kingdom, USA, Sweden.

Now you tin can read a relatively short merely well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its part in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Doc – Baronial 27, 2013

SMALLPOX Bloodshed- Great britain, Usa & SWEDEN

In the graphs below notice the large numbers of deaths caused past the smallpox vaccine itself.  Past 1901 in the UK, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the disease dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished by vaccination, as the medical "consensus" view tells usa. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to "piece of work" did not.  On any scientific analysis of the history and information, crediting smallpox vaccine for the decline in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the Metropolis of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the rest of the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [see table beneath].  Leicester's approach also toll far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Entire Volume as .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

TABLE 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Name.	Flow.	Pocket-size-Pox.  Cases	Minor-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Japan	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.8
British Army (U.k.)	1860-1908	1,355	96	vii.1
British Army (Republic of india)	1860-1908	two,753	307	eleven.1
British Army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	viii.eight
Imperial Navy	1860-1908	ii,909	234	8.0
Chiliad Totals and case fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.3
Leicester (since giving up vaccination)	1880-1908	1,206	61	v.one

Biggs said "In this comparison, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, so that they may be compared either manner with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I ask, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Nihon, of the British Army, and of the Royal Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would afford an interesting psychical written report were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a corresponding result—but on the opposite side."

Tabular array 29.

Small-Pox Epidemics, Toll, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Minor-Pox Cases	Small-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Cost of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	nine,659	1,594	xvi.fifty	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	eleven.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	7,066	688	9.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	5.34	£2,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	xxx	4.10	£1,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Doctor

– August 27, 2013

With the approaching flu season and the enthusiastic calls to employ the influenza vaccine, yous might be wondering where the idea of vaccination got its start. Where did the thought of injecting whole or $.25 of microbes and other substances into people in an attempt to provide protection against contagious disease begin?

Many medical and history books present a elementary tale of the origin of vaccination. Virtually present the same basic tale of the vivid observation of a simple country doctor and his backbone in attempting to thwart a mortiferous and frightening disease of that time – smallpox, or as it was often called the speckled monster. In a contempo and popular book, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an 8-twelvemonth old boy named James Phipps to test his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes's cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd fabricated in Phipps'south hands. The male child came down with a slight fever, simply cypher more. Afterward, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should accept resulted in a total-blown, albeit mild, example of the disease. Cypher happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox once again; over again, nothing. [1]

Edward Jenner'due south thought eventually became known equally vaccination, which is derived from the Latin word for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, but eventually the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in place, smallpox would be tamed and the world would be freed from the terror of the affliction.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is not unlike the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the child-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly ophidian-headed Medusa, or many other archetype stories of the brave hero defeating a deadly enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a unproblematic and memorable story of a hero defeating the deadly enemy, smallpox. Authors claim that with vaccination in place, "billions of lives" have been saved.[2]

Just legendary heroes, peculiarly those that are used to back up a belief, achieve an iconic status while any unsavory aspects virtually the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using small amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the artillery of healthy people. This thought was introduced to the Western world by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with cognition of the practice of inoculation against smallpox, known as variolation. This type of inoculation was only a matter of infecting a person with smallpox at a time and in a setting of his choosing. The idea behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would do improve against the illness than if they contracted it at some mayhap less desirable time and place in the future.

The thought was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically good. But considering of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an performance that could simply be afforded past the wealthy.[3] The process did often help protect the individual that was inoculated, just at that place was nonetheless an estimated ii-5% that died as a outcome.[4,5] Still, this was an improvement compared to a xx-25% bloodshed rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[6] But, was the departure in mortality due to inoculation alone? Or could it accept had something to do with the fact that the wealthy had better access to more nutritious food and a cleaner environs than the bulk of society?

There was one major and generally unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than there would have been naturally. In a 1764 commodity the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious disease and that the practise of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years subsequently, and found that smallpox deaths had increased⎯not decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse problems, because it caused more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably like the plague a contagious disease, what tends to terminate the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increment that danger; the practice of Inoculation plainly tends to spread the contamination, for a contagious disease is produced by Inoculation where it would not otherwise have been produced; the place where information technology is thus produced becomes a centre of contagion, whence it spreads not less fatally or widely than it would spread from a center where the disease should happen in a natural style; these centers of contagion are patently multiplied very greatly by Inoculation . . .[7]

Nevertheless, while the popularity of variolation varied, the problem of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had get a very lucrative process information technology was enthusiastically continued by almost of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early on 1800s. Smallpox continued to be spread past this medically-sanctioned procedure.

Now enters the hero of our legend. It was rumored among milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect 1 from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an viii-twelvemonth-erstwhile boy named James Phipps. He took disease matter that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He later on deliberately exposed the child to smallpox equally a test to meet if he was protected by the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did non contract clinical smallpox, it was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with only rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the use of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would exist immune to smallpox, there were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a coming together of the Dr.-Convivial Society, Jenner was ridiculed over his practise.

But he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at information technology. The cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where pocket-size-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [8]

From the beginning there were problems with Jenner's process. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox matter obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were then tested past existence inoculated with smallpox to encounter if the cowpox procedure had been effective. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect any of them. Jenner received the written report but decided to ignore the results considering they were not in back up of his theory.[9]

Vaccination was apace embraced by many in the medical profession as the reply to combating smallpox. By 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the belief that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical community continued to embrace Jenner'south ideas amidst numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that there were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were still dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Kid was vaccinated past Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the finish of the year 1799. A month later it was inoculated with small-pox matter without effect, and a few months subsequently took confluent small-scale-pox and died. 2. A woman-servant to Mr. Gamble, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the coincidental way from milking. Vii years subsequently she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she caught small-pox, and died. iii and iv. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, iii years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted pocket-size-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . thirteen. The child of Mr. R died of modest-pox in Oct 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were assured of its security. The vaccinator'southward name was concealed. 14. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam's part . . . died of pocket-size-pox a year after vaccination.[10]

Reports through the early on 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was non living upwardly to its promise to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-pox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[11] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an 18% fatality rate and is essentially the aforementioned fatality rate every bit smallpox earlier vaccination was introduced. This high fatality rate along with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a direct claiming to this new and highly lauded medical process.

Some other article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering under Pocket-size Pox, who have previously undergone Vaccination by the almost good practitioners, is at present alarmingly great.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brown, a surgeon with 30 years of experience in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an article discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no one in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice." Simply after vaccinating 1,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that, afterward vaccination, people nonetheless could contract and even die from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the practise.[13]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the time were amply compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a tendency to embrace it as a new form of income. It is therefore quite pregnant for a doctor to accept spoken out against information technology as Dr. Brown did.

Continued observations showed that smallpox could withal infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could as well be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, 1, and, 2 [1820-1822] at that place was a great hubbub virtually the small-pox. It broke out with the groovy epidemic to the due north . . . It pressed shut to domicile to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had small-pox before, and frequently severely; almost to decease; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some alone, but fell upon dandy numbers.[fourteen]

William Cobbett was a farmer, announcer, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote about the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical practice. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed past JENNER HIMSELF, accept taken the real small-pox afterwards, and have either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![15]

During this time vaccine cloth was the "humanized" form, which meant that material was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the next person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, but as failures increased there was a belief that the vaccine had lost its original supposed authorisation, and there were calls to obtain fresh material straight from cows.[16]

While the fable maintained that the vaccine material came from cows, Jenner actually believed the material originated from an infectious condition of horses called the "grease." From this and other beliefs, there were many attempts to recreate an original moo-cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was just smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new disease.[18] This faulty belief would issue in the creation of more than smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a man who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a cow's udder. He and so took pus from that cow and used it to vaccinate people. A large smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[19] A afterwards inquiry determined that this was cypher more than the erstwhile do of smallpox inoculation.[xx]

Not only was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, merely there were as well reports of deaths from other causes shortly subsequently vaccination. For example, a skin condition called erysipelas was a especially prolonged and painful fashion to dice.

. . . a male child from Somers-boondocks, aged 5 years, "pocket-size-pox confluent, unmodified (9 days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of iv months; 1 cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, anile 22 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (8 days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; two good cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged 10 weeks, and the son of a saccharide baker, aged thirteen weeks, died of "general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the encephalon."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was being used, other diseases could be spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke before the Academy at Paris.

First I rejected the thought that syphilis could be transplanted by vaccination. But facts accumulated more and more, and now I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by means of the vaccine. I practice this very reluctantly. At present I do non hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

As it became increasingly articulate throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what it was promised to be, refusals increased. In order to deal with this, the judicial system intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a ready of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did nothing to curb the problem of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting effectually 1837, at that place were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the swell 1872 epidemic. Later 1855, at that place were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-sixty, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the most severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These echo smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no outcome at all (Graph one). In fact, more people died in the 20 years after the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the xx years before.

Graph i: Boston smallpox mortality rate from 1841 to 1880.

By this point, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were fabricated that vaccination fabricated smallpox less likely to impale or that smallpox would exist milder. Calls were and then made for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every ten years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out against the process. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent dr. of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were beingness made by vaccinators. Immense fiscal gain combined with the force of police created the perfect environment that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western world.

The public vaccinators have received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 alone they amounted to £54,727, and in the present year they volition get nearly a quarter million. Other sums, likewise, which I cannot name, accept been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a quack remedy produced and so much gain?

[26]

In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. However, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A great pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, even those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French regular army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian war there were twenty-three thousand four hundred and threescore-nine cases of modest-pox in that army. The London Lancet of July 15, 1871 said:

Of nine thousand three hundred and ninety-two small-pox patients in London hospitals, six thousand eight hundred and l-4 had been vaccinated. Seventeen and half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole land more than i hundred and twenty-two k vaccinated persons accept suffered from small-pox . . . Official returns from Federal republic of germany show that between 1870 and 1885 ane million vaccinated persons died from small-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine prophylactic, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and freedom through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine movement. People began to resist the government and chose to pay fines. Some even accepted imprisonment rather than allowing vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backlash culminated in the great demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That same year Leicester's government, which had pushed for vaccination through the utilise of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. Past 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to ten%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and effective means that eliminated the need for vaccination. Nevertheless, there were dire predictions from the majority of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the low vaccination charge per unit would upshot in a terrible "massacre," especially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the town's residents were steadfast in their belief that vaccination was not necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually be plagued with disaster never did come to laissez passer. Depression vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[30] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed every bit the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The experience of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an centre-sore to the pro-vaccinists the earth over. Here is a great manufacturing town having a population of nearly a quarter of a one thousand thousand, which has demonstrated by a crucial exam of an experience extending over a menses of more a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to small-pox and far less affected past that disease since it abandoned vaccination than it was at a fourth dimension when xc-five per cent of its births were vaccinated and its adult population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was frequently promoted as a safe procedure, it often caused sickness or fifty-fifty death. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than ane,600 in England (Graph 3). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph four).

Graph 2: Leicester England smallpox bloodshed rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph 3: England and Wales total deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph 4: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the end of the 1800s, smallpox changed its character. After the summer of 1897, the severe type of smallpox with its high expiry rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United States. Smallpox turned from a affliction that killed 1 in five of its victims to one that only killed anywhere from 1 in 50 and later to as low as 1 in 380. The disease could still kill, but having become so much milder, it was frequently mistaken for diverse other pox infections or skin eruptions.

During 1896 a very balmy type of smallpox began to prevail in the Due south and later gradually spread over the country. The bloodshed was very low and it [smallpox] was usually at first mistaken for craven pox. . .[32]

The writer of a 1913 article in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox expiry rate was around xx%, as information technology had been historically. The table too showed that after 1896 the death rate fell off speedily, starting with half-dozen% in 1897 to as low as 0.26% by 1908. Equally the balmy form of smallpox replaced the classic type, smallpox could be difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this fourth dimension, considered a mild illness of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a minor communicable disease of childhood, and is chiefly important considering information technology frequently gives rise to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]

Past the 1920s information technology was recognized that the new course of smallpox produced little in the style of symptoms, even though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although there has been no protection by vaccination, the form of the disease is extremely balmy. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the constitutional symptoms balmy or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely low vaccine coverage rate, there was never a resurgence of smallpox. Even though smallpox was non a major consequence, the practice of smallpox vaccination continued from the time of the concluding smallpox death in the United states in 1948 up until 1963. This resulted in an estimated 5,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 study detailed the cases of ix children in which two died of a pare condition due to vaccination, now being termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated by the authors to be between i in twenty,000 to i in 100,000 with a fatality rate of 4 to 40%.[35] All the same, they best-selling that most cases were non reported and there was no authentic accounting on this outcome of vaccination. At that place were also an estimated 200 to 300 deaths as the result of smallpox vaccination, while during the aforementioned fourth dimension at that place had simply been 1 smallpox death in 1948.[36]

The final smallpox death in the U.s. post-obit an importation occurred in 1948, simply since that time in that location have been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is still occurring today, as recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his military machine father after the father was vaccinated. Afterwards a prolonged access, and a calendar week of experimental treatments including allowed globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The female parent also required handling and virus was establish all over the house.[38]

Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 study thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually take been fifty-fifty college. This study only examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the U.s.a.. If the deaths were this high in a state with a modernistic health-intendance system, what was the total number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present across the entire world?

There were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has now hardly a serious supporter. We are ashamed to jettison the idea completely and perhaps afraid that if we did the accident of some future epidemic might put united states of america in the wrong. Nosotros adopt to let compulsory vaccination die a natural death and are relieved that the general public is not curious enough to demand an inquest. In the concurrently our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this fourth dimension with vaccination as virtually the but medically promoted way to deal with affliction, in that location were doctors finding astonishing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common nutrient product that is made through fermentation of a diversity of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. Yard. Oliphant, M.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the use of Acetic acid in scarlet fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" as applied to small pox. Dr. Roth first claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more reliable every bit a safe in modest-pox than Belladonna in scarlet fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the sick and to the exposed 2 table-spoonfuls of vinegar, after breakfast and at evening, for fourteen days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the prophylactic treatment died, while amid those under ordinary treatment the mortality was as usual.[40]

In 1899 Dr. Howe besides demonstrated vinegar'due south power to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to take care of other people with smallpox without fearfulness of contracting the disease. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar equally a existent preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should exist used three or iv times a day to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Lodge, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the bang-up men who for a century by have been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, now comes to the front in the newspapers with the existent preventative. "Any person who has been exposed demand take no fear of smallpox if he volition take two or three tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar three or iv times a day." The discussion may now be regarded equally airtight, and smallpox at terminal is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem silly, merely just because almost people take been conditioned to accept the historic period-old prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, illness-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected animal'southward (ordinarily a cow) belly, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the human being arm with a metallic prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier at present?

Scurvy is a illness that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or only an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the formation of healthy collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in skin, bones, and blood vessels and likewise gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the torso is not able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve every bit mortar belongings cells together and, equally a upshot, literally comes unglued and falls autonomously.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of King'due south College, described the poor diet of golden miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fatty, coffee, and alcohol while working long, difficult days under the unrelenting California lord's day. The vitamin C-scarce diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent amongst the aureate miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, every bit living most entirely upon fried bacon or fat pork and flour made into batter-cakes, and fried in the fat, which completely saturates it. This is done down with copious librations of strong java, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, under a scorching sun, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the same time subjected to the most intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gold Rush of the mid-1800s, an estimated 10,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Civil State of war twice as many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases as those killed in battle.[44] For instance, the causes of expiry listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy directly deemed for at least two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the adjacent common cause of death, with the infamous diseases such as smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for only a small fraction. Those who were killed in actual battle or who died equally a result of their wounds accounted simply for 1 percent of the full deaths.

Other large infectious killers such as crimson fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping coughing (also known as pertussis) all greatly declined during this time to where they were either completely eliminated or considered mild babyhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive decline of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph v & six).

Graph five: England and Wales whooping cough bloodshed rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph half-dozen: England and Wales measles bloodshed charge per unit from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a state doctor making a discovery that saved the earth from the devastation of smallpox is a fundamental medical conventionalities that continues to exist echoed by indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine faith. Just the true history shows us a different reality.

The make name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the world psyche equally something to protect someone from an disease. This belief spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of disease matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific disease. The reality of vaccination is nil close to the myth.

Other extremely effective alternative methods of sanitation, diet, apple tree cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and accept since vanished from societal collective memory. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner'southward cracking discovery and the connected onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are at present a regular thing from cradle to grave, all in the proper noun of supposedly healthier people. Now that the pall has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, do more and more vaccines seem like a good idea to you?

More information on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping cough, and lost remedies tin exist plant in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk'due south book "Dissolving Illusions" which can be institute on amazon.com

Bibliography:
one.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
2.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
iii.Victor C. Vaughan, Doc, Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.Five. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
4.Frederick F. Cartwright, Affliction and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
5.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the Start Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present Country of the British Settlements of North-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
6.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford University Press, 2007, p.179.
vii."The Practice of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman's Magazine and Historical Chronicle, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
viii.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Instance Against Vaccination, Goddard's Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
nine.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
10.William Scott Tebb, Doc, A Century of Vaccination and What it Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination past Act of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. Eight, July-Dec, 1817, p. 95.
13.Mr. Thomas Brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Nowadays State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Volume Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
xiv."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 583.
xv.William Cobbett, Advice to Immature Men and (Incidentally) to Immature Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
16.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present State of Vaccination in French republic," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and journal of practical medicine, vol. 20, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Communication and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. iv, 1834, p. 796.
19.Ephraim Cutter, MD, "Partial Written report on the Product of Vaccine Virus in the United States," Transactions of the American Medical Clan, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
20.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning Relate, Wednesday, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Wellness in the State of New York and Massachusetts," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. 4, February 1909, p. fifty-51.
24."Small-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. half dozen, Feb 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Scout, April 1911, vol. nineteen, no. iv, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.Thou. W. Harman, MD, "A Physician'due south Statement Against the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Brief: A Monthly Journal of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. 1, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June ane, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Confronting Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, April 16, 1885, p. 380.
thirty.J. Westward. Hodge, MD, "Prophylaxis to exist Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Non by the Propagation of Disease," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. fifteen.
31.J. Due west. Hodge, Physician, "How Small-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. III, no. 16, Jan, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles V. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Infectious disease as Shown by the History of Smallpox in the United States," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. ii, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Manufactory Lancaster, An introduction to the practice of preventive medicine, C.5. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Price Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume 1, W.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds MD and Howard A. Joos Doc, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, August 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, Academy of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale periodical of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. 10.
38.Maggie Fox, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological back-number," Lancet, Jan 1, 1938, pp. 48-49.
xl."Acetic Acid in Scarlet Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Scientific discipline, vol. 1, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Forbid Smallpox," The Critique, January 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Journal of Medicine, vol. Vi, no. 1, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Health. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of Rex's College," Medical Times, vol. 23, January four to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Mankind, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), November 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Kid Health Safety, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, government, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, science, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines |

garzasuchers.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post